Revenue Procedure 2005-14: Combine IRC §121 and IRC §1031 to Save TaxesKelly Bradley Esq.
August 17, 2005 — 1,589 views
Until recently, a taxpayer that converted a personal residence to an investment property or vice versa, had to choose between using IRC §121 (exclusion of gain on the sale of a principal residence) or IRC §1031 (non-recognition of gain in like-kind exchange). However, with the issuance of Revenue Procedure 2005-14 (1/27/2005, corrected 2/3/2005), taxpayers can combine the benefits of both code sections, as long as the requirements of both sections can be separately met.
The following example will be used throughout the article for illustration purposes: Joan buys a house for $210,000 and uses it as her principal residence from 2000-2004. From 2004 until 2006 Joan rents the house and claims depreciation deductions of $20,000. In 2006, Joan exchanges her current property (relinquished property) for $470,000 and purchases a new rental property (replacement property) for $460,000. Joan walks away with $10,000 cash. Joan’s adjusted cost basis is $190,000 ($210,000 purchase price - $20,000 depreciation taken) and her realized gain is $280,000 ($470,000 sales price - $190,000 adjusted cost basis).
Step 1: Determine if the property qualifies for IRC §121.
IRC §121 allows a taxpayer to exclude from income a gain up to $250,000 ($500,000 if married, filing jointly) resulting from the sale of a principal residence as long as the taxpayer has lived in the property for at least 2 of the last 5 years as a principal residence. Effective October 22, 2004, IRC §121 was amended to provide, that taxpayers who acquired property in a IRC §1031 exchange, must hold the property for 5 years from the acquisition date before being able to apply IRC §121.
Joan’s property qualifies for IRC §121 because she has lived in the property as her personal residence for at least 2 years during the 5-year period prior to the exchange.
Step 2: Determine if the property qualifies for IRC §1031.
IRC §1031 allows the deferral of capital gain realized by exchanging property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment for like-kind property to be held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment. To the extent that the taxpayer also receives cash or other non like-kind property (boot), gain must be recognized.
Joan’s property qualifies for §1031 because it was used as an investment property for the periods 2004-2006.
Step 3: Apply IRC §121 before IRC §1031.
If the taxpayer meets the requirements of both IRC §121 and IRC §1031, the taxpayer must apply IRC §121 to the gain realized before applying IRC §1031.
Joan will apply IRC §121 first to exclude $250,000 of the $280,000 of gain.
Step 4: Apply IRC §1031 to gain attributable to depreciation.
Although IRC §121 does not exclude depreciation recapture after May 6, 1997, this amount may be deferred by utilizing IRC §1031.
Joan may defer the remaining $30,000 of gain, including the $20,000 of gain due to depreciation using IRC §1031.
Step 5: Apply IRC §121 to gain attributable to boot.
Boot, which is taxable under IRC §1031, will only be taken into account to the extent the boot exceeds the gain excluded under IRC §121.
Although Joan received $10,000 in cash boot in this example, she is not required to recognize gain because the boot does not exceed the $250,000 of gain excluded under IRC §121.
Step 6: Increase basis of replacement property by gain recognized under IRC §121.
Normally, in an IRC §1031 exchange, the taxpayer gets a carryover basis. However, by combining IRC §121 and IRC §1031 the basis of the replacement property is increased by the gain recognized under IRC §121.
Joan’s basis in the Replacement Property is $430,000 ($190,000 carryover basis from Relinquished Property + $250,000 gain excluded under IRC §121 - $10,000 cash boot received).
The Revenue Procedure provides six examples of how IRC §121 and IRC §1031 can be combined and applied to a single exchange of property. As it’s a rare occurrence for the IRS to teach us how to save taxes, it’s important for tax advisors to familiarize themselves with this much welcome guidance.
Kelly A. Bradley, Esq., Assistant Vice President of Investment Property Exchange Services, Inc. (“IPX”) is a member of the New York State Bar and has been involved in both tax and real estate law for several years. Prior to joining the Northeast Division of IPX, Kelly served as a Transaction Supervisor and Assistant Vice President for the National Reverse and Improvement Exchange Division of IPX. In addition, Kelly has previously worked as a tax consultant for a Big 6 public accounting firm and practiced real estate law with a Central New York law firm. In May 2004, Kelly was awarded the Certified Exchange Specialist (CES®) Designation through the Federation of Exchange Accommodators, Inc.
Kelly received her B.S. in accounting from Binghamton University and her J.D. from Syracuse University School of Law.
Kelly Bradley Esq.
Investment Property Exchange Services, Inc.